|
| ||||||||
Research and Publications
(RAP)
Since the
early 1990s, peacebuilding
has emerged as a distinct field of policymaking and research. Yet, many
aspects of the peacebuilding agenda remain highly contested. For
instance, throughout the past decade, internationally pioneered
peacebuilding practices have been focused on creating stability rather
than long-term peacebuilding strategies that include quick-fix
solutions, short-term engagement and exit strategy. It is in this
regard that WANEP has prioritized the need for a combined approach that
involves research with the overarching goal to assess and monitor
conflict indicators. This has also been to broaden and shift the scope
and norm of peacebuilding practices from ‘reaction to prevention’. This
is to ensure that, the causes of conflict will not only be identified,
but the best strategies for approaching them will be formulated to
prevent conflicts. Objectives
The existing ad hoc approach to peacebuilding
observed in Guinea Bissau, Ivory Coast, Liberia and Sierra Leone are
justifiable evidence to suggest that practices emerging from research in
the West Africa Sub-region yet remain underdeveloped. The available
findings have limited analytical quality with limited policy
recommendations, as in the case of Guinea Bissau. They also tend to
focus almost exclusively on the short and medium term solution, whilst
the long term process expected to build sustainable peace and
development are largely disregarded. What in fact is required here is a
coherent research-based practice that will help to address the
interrelated phenomena of peacebuilding in a systematic and co-ordinated
fashion at the national and regional levels.
Monitoring and Evaluation
(M&E)
Monitoring and evaluation has been one of the most
neglected areas of peacebuilding in the past years, partly due to the
lack of proper planning, a well established M&E framework, and resources
purposely dedicated to the process. As such, peacebuilding
practitioners in West Africa, including WANEP are increasingly
confronted with the challenge to concretely demonstrate the positive
impact of their work. Despite the positive strides made so far,
WANEP’s peacebuilding practitioners realize that there is a discrepancy
between measuring the desired outcomes and their peacebuilding
initiatives. Another challenge is to provide credible and objective data
on the causes, trends, and triggers of conflicts in order to ensure
timely intervention in conflict situations. The reason is that quite
often, policy makers and CSOs have encountered gaps in information,
which prevent them to design appropriate response to some crises. Objectives:
This has highlighted the need to enhance effective
M&E framework for sustainable peacebuilding programmes. The need to
develop mechanisms or tools to monitor conflicts, determine the impact
of WANEP’s work and produce relevant documents is critical as WANEP
forges strategic partnerships with other institutions such as CSOs,
governmental institutions and bilateral donor agencies which normally
require impact assessment tools be integrated in funded projects. This
program is designed to be integrated in all the activities of WANEP. All
WANEP personnel will therefore be trained with the knowledge for
peacebuilding monitoring and evaluation.
Expected Outputs
|
RAP M&E QUICK LINKS
|
|
|
West Africa Peacebuilding
Institute (WAPI) |
||
| Women in Peacebuilding Program (WIPNET) | ||
|
Civil
Society Policy and Advocacy Program (CSPAP) |
||
|
Capacity
Building in Conflict Prevention, Peacebuilding and Good Governance (CBP) |
||
| Research and Publications, Monitoring and Evaluation (RAP - M&E) | ||
| Justice Lens (JLP) | ||
| Early Warning and Early Response (WARN) | ||
| Home | ||
|
© Copyright 2006 AD. West Africa Network for Peacebuilding. All Rights Reserved. |